Re: Re[2]: [ihc] Final round (hopefully) of Postal 800 talk

To: <ihc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [ihc] Final round (hopefully) of Postal 800 talk
From: "Joseph Shaw, II" <josephshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:16:40 -0500
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <402F9D94.539FF5DC@domain.elided> <004101c3f43d$3799e200$6101a8c0@Atlas> <4030E360.629CE565@domain.elided> <002001c3f4ac$09ec01c0$6101a8c0@Atlas> <1634296803.20040216095844@domain.elided>
Reply-to: "Joseph Shaw, II" <josephshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

> re: 7 mpg 258
>
> I think it's indicative of the use.  Talk about stop-and-go.  Postal
> routes are likely to be a worst case scenario in determining fuel
> mileage.
>
> Ken


Duh!!!

I kind of didn't think about that at the time of my writing!  I am getting
more dunderheaded every day!!!

Thanks for metioning that!  Helps me understand it a bit better!

Michael

References:
- [ihc] Final round (hopefully) of Postal 800 talk
  - From: David Bongo
- Re: [ihc] Final round (hopefully) of Postal 800 talk
  - From: Joseph Shaw, II
- Re: [ihc] Final round (hopefully) of Postal 800 talk
  - From: David Bongo
- Re: [ihc] Final round (hopefully) of Postal 800 talk
  - From: Joseph Shaw, II
- Re[2]: [ihc] Final round (hopefully) of Postal 800 talk
  - From: ken.dunnington

Prev by Date: [ihc] Postal Mileage, 256/152/345
Next by Date: Re: [ihc] Light line diesels
Previous by thread: [ihc] Postal Mileage, 256/152/345
Next by thread: Re: [ihc] Final round (hopefully) of Postal 800 talk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index