Re: 164 L or S, and Speed

[Alan Lambert <gerard@domain.elided>]

You forget that the driver is VERY experienced and very good!



On Mon, 31 May 1999, Jess Liao wrote:

> 
> I've been following this thread because I was curious myself about
> actual difference between the two. However, Seeing 164 L in action
> at Willo Spring TT this last long weekend told me either S or L
> are both super-great cars.
> 
> The said silver 164L (correct me if I am wrong, Charlie!), completely
> stock with some goodyear m+s tires, was driven hot laps at WS the big
> track and turning times better than many many "sports cars".  I first
> spotted the 164 on the track during practice sessions, and followed it
> around (eye sight, now actually following it on the track) and saw how
> fast it went around the corners and decided to time it. 1:50!!!! (he
> probaly did better than that later!!) on m+s tires?!?!!!
> 
> nore more theoretical asumption for me, both are super cars.
> 
> Jess <-- 2 super cars owner :) milano + 164
> 
> 
> 
> 

================================================================================
Regards,
Alan G. Lambert___________________________________<gerard@domain.elided>
           *******Los Altos, California (office)*******

------------------------------