RE: [ihc] AMC build-ups

To: "Joel Furtek" <furtek@xxxxxxx>, "Pete Shubin" <pshubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'ken.dunnington'" <ken.dunnington@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ihc] AMC build-ups
From: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:32:32 -0800
Cc: <ihc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
In-reply-to: <a06002001bdd6b2d7df3e@[10.0.1.2]>
Reply-to: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joel Furtek
>Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 4:25 PM
>To: Pete Shubin; 'ken.dunnington'
>Cc: ihc@domain.elided
>Subject: [ihc] AMC build-ups

>the 1971 401 4v was rated at 330 gross HP (10.2:1 compression); the '72,
with 8.5:1 compression,
>was rated at 255 NET HP, which I think is pretty respectable!

I have long suspected that the IH 2bbl spec for the 401 was an effort to
make it look like a comparable alternative to the 392, as opposed to a hi-po
upgrade!

Jim

Follow-Ups:
- [ihc] Great Christmas Gift for your Scout II friends..
  - From: Jeff Bade

References:
- [ihc] AMC build-ups
  - From: Joel Furtek

Prev by Date: Re: [ihc] Re: OT but neat/Cog
Next by Date: RE: [ihc] Engine ID by pic
Previous by thread: [ihc] AMC build-ups
Next by thread: [ihc] Great Christmas Gift for your Scout II friends..
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index