Re: alfa-digest V8 #340

[BrianPal10@domain.elided]

In a message dated 1/5/02 12:52:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
owner-alfa-digest@domain.elided writes:


> But the CVT can take less torque, is far more expensive, less efficient
> and heavier
> 
> 

I think you mean that the CVT is less mechanically efficient.  But, by 
allowing the engine to stay at the most efficient operating speed for all 
conditions, it more that makes up for the slight loss in mechanical 
efficiency.

Brian

--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to majordomo@domain.elided