RE: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--

To: "John M. Adams" <jma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--
From: Ted Borck <tborck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:26:55 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Greg Hermann <bearbvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ihc@xxxxxxxxxx
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
In-reply-to: <LPBBIBAEGJDCKGEHINLMEEJGHNAA.jma@domain.elided>
References: <LPBBIBAEGJDCKGEHINLMEEJGHNAA.jma@domain.elided>
Reply-to: Ted Borck <tborck@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, John M. Adams wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ihc@domain.elided [mailto:owner-ihc@domain.elided]On Behalf Of
Greg Hermann
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 9:42 PM
To: ihc@domain.elided
Subject: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--


Saw a 148 wheeler (highway) rig today !!!!

P.S. If that WAS an E60C or equivalent loco like their other ones, its
weight is typically between 185 and 195 U.S. tons (plus or minus a few
pounds... :) If you add the weight of the two tractors, the "jeeps", the
carrier beam... Man, I don't want to think what the total weight of that rig
was. How do get a rating to drive something like that? It's not like there's
much opportunity to practice! Wish I could have seen it...

Any pictures?

Perhaps there is a URL w/photos published by the power company, locomotive or trucking company.

I'd look, but don't know what to ask for.

--
Ted Borck tborck@domain.elided

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--
  - From: John M. Adams

References:
- RE: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--
  - From: John M. Adams

Prev by Date: RE: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--
Next by Date: RE: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--
Previous by thread: RE: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--
Next by thread: RE: [ihc] no IH content, but fun--
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index