IHC/IHC Digest Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason

To: "Tom Harais" <THarais@xxxxxxxxx>, <ihc-digest@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason
From: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:46:56 -0700
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
In-reply-to: <C7C2CDDC42D60F428E44128C17C6490A1AC195@domain.elided>
Reply-to: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

>Tom Harais
>Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:22 AM
>To: ihc-digest@domain.elided
>Subject: RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason

>Jim:

>Wasn't that for California only at the time?

Dunno.
  
>What does the "XLC" stand for? Extra Load Capacity maybe?

Seems logical. IIRC Howard has weighed in on this before.

Jim

References:
- RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason
  - From: Tom Harais

Prev by Date: RE: [ihc] A question...
Next by Date: RE: [ihc] A question...
Previous by thread: RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason
Next by thread: RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index