RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason

To: "Steven Stegmann" <steve.stegmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rocky Lear" <rockylear@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ihc-digest@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason
From: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:59:18 -0700
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-reply-to: <20040928153111.34696.qmail@domain.elided>
Reply-to: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

>Steven Stegmann
>Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 8:31 AM
>To: Rocky Lear; ihc-digest@domain.elided
>Subject: Re: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason

>Was that the year Ford created the F-150 by re-rating
>the F-100?  If the vehicle was above a certain GVW it
>didn't get smogged, or the smogging rules were
>different.

By moving the GVW to a minimum 6200#, everybody avoided having to install
cats until '79. Thus the Scout II 'XLC'.

Jim

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason
  - From: Steven Stegmann

References:
- Re: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason
  - From: Steven Stegmann

Prev by Date: RE: [ihc] A question...
Next by Date: RE: [ihc] Advice needed
Previous by thread: Re: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason
Next by thread: RE: [ihc] GVW's Seemingly no rhyme or reason
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index