Re: [ihc] RE: David's decarbonisation

To: "ken.dunnington" <ken.dunnington@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ihc] RE: David's decarbonisation
From: John Hofstetter <hofs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:02:22 -0700
Cc: "David Bongo" <dbongo@xxxxxxxxx>, ihc@xxxxxxxxxx, "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
In-reply-to: <363691638.20040817114737@domain.elided>
References: <INEFKLOIOJIBIGBFDIJEIEKDCCAA.jgrammer@domain.elided> <363691638.20040817114737@domain.elided>
Reply-to: John Hofstetter <hofs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

On Aug 17, 2004, at 10:47 AM, ken.dunnington wrote:

Are there possible detrimental outcomes to the solvent down the carb
"trick"?

Ken

None of which I know. I used to do it all the time. (How about "all the time" as a gross overgeneralization. I am becoming my wife which is likely to make continuing our loving relationship more difficult.)

It may be against city ordinances some places to make that much smoke, but .....

John

John Hofstetter
Ol' Saline
www.goldrush.com/~hofs

References:
- [ihc] RE: David's decarbonisation
  - From: Jim Grammer
- Re: [ihc] RE: David's decarbonisation
  - From: ken.dunnington

Prev by Date: Re: [ihc] RE: David's decarbonisation
Next by Date: [ihc] Re: Insurance
Previous by thread: Re: [ihc] RE: David's decarbonisation
Next by thread: RE: [ihc] RE: David's decarbonisation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index