RE: [ihc] RE: 500's

To: "Tom Mandera" <tsm1@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ihc] RE: 500's
From: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:43:52 -0800
Cc: <ihc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-reply-to: <405F5BE2.9010304@domain.elided>
Reply-to: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

Yup, totally different frame, looks like it was just a continuation of the
150/1500 frames. Long springs IIRC.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Mandera [mailto:tsm1@domain.elided]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 1:34 PM
To: Jim Grammer
Cc: ihc@domain.elided
Subject: Re: [ihc] RE: 500's

What I meant was.. did they use the "4x4" short leaves, or the pre-74
2wd longer leaves?

'course, it may have been an entirely different frame that IH never
thought of converting to IFS and coils anyhow.. :D

References:
- Re: [ihc] RE: 500's
  - From: Tom Mandera

Prev by Date: Re: [ihc] RE: 500's
Next by Date: [ihc] Anybody want to tow to Dixie?
Previous by thread: Re: [ihc] RE: 500's
Next by thread: [ihc] Unsolicited testimonial for Magnecor, from my mind which is without a spark
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index