Re: Tom's 'new' motor

To: danees@xxxxxxxxx (Daniel Nees)
Subject: Re: Tom's 'new' motor
From: dpetters@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 06:22:13 -0400
Cc: jmbrodsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Joel M Brodsky), ihc@xxxxxxxxxx
Content-disposition: inline
Content-language: en
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-to: dpetters@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

Ouch !!!!
 Man that was uncalled for!!!LOLOLOLOLOL
Dennis P
----- Original Message -----
From: danees@domain.elided (Daniel Nees)
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: Tom's 'new' motor

> And you guys tell me to stay away from 392's....
>   I guess Tom needs to stay away from 392's and 345's, oh, also 304's
> since his racer motor is a 304 Maybe Tom should stick to the 4 
> cylinderhe used to have. He never did blow up one of them.
> 
> Dan Nees
> danees@domain.elided

Prev by Date: Re: Home from RMIHR
Next by Date: electrical stumper
Previous by thread: Re: Tom's 'new' motor
Next by thread: Re: Tom's 'new' motor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index