[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reading 101 or Making up
- Subject: Reading 101 or Making up
- From: Land Shark <lndshrk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 21:35:14 -0700
At 11:11 PM 11/11/98 -0500, mark kibort wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OK , your the expert . Did you forget that
>I have relieved .5 psi in the air box?
For the love of christ.. will you learn to write.. and speak..
Look at what you wrote above...
It's basically illegible.. it takes a darned NSA Crypto clerk to
translate it to plaintext english..
You achieved 0.02 bar.. period.. stop with the games already
you're not fooling anyone.. and that's assuming that you even
achieved that level of "boost".
> That is a difference of almost .1 bar (.5 psi neg and .35 psi
>positive.) so , for your below calculation, and heat is not really part
>of the calculation because it is so small of a factor. So , by your own
>calculation, It would be more than 4X of the below increases.
>THANKS FOR THE VALIDATION.!!!!!
WHOA..
#1) Heat IS a factor.. ANY time you compress air you create it..
MAN.. you never really DID take a Thermo class did you..
#2) doubling boost does NOT double the power output..
Pick up a book on turbocharging.. PLEASE..
And allowing for even a doubling.. 4%.. you'd lose 2 to the alt.
and the other 2 would be invisible on the dyno..
The term is STATISTICALLY insignficant..
Of course.. I don't believe your seeing anything at all..
Like I said in the original.. GIVING YOU THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT
(for example) which I don't..
I think it's all B.S... and I'm not the only one.. so if you're
such the innovator, take out a patent!
Lastly.. don't put words in my mouth.. you'll meet people with
names like Dan and Craig.. with the initials J.D. and Esq. after
their names.. nice guys really, until you piss them off..
Mark.. Just give it a rest.. if you want to talk about this baloney
then talk to it in a forum where there ARE no engineers and lots
of dumb consumers.. you'll be rich soon..
Most BMW owners, at least the ones on the net, are far too
technically SAVVY to listen to this twisted line of reasoning.
Jim
------------------------------