[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
<misc>proofreading
>> keystrokes...we all have built in error correction ability. However, the
>> bottom line is poor spelling and other mistakes make a poor impression to
>> the reader no matter how good the info. Whether it is for the "Freakin'
>> Net" or anywhere else it doesn't doesn't (sic) take long to re-read what
you
>> wrote to make sure spelling and punctuation are correct.
>
>Now _I'm_ confused. Is that a double negative meaning it takes a while
>to do? Is that tongue-in-cheek humor? Did this person not proof a
>message about proof reading? Maybe there was some 90 proof involved?
>>8^)
Next time I won't be so subtle (not that there will be a next time...). I
braced myself for hoots and happy shouts of "you idiot" on this one.
Instead, one person noticed. Oh well, back to school for a refresher
course in Humor 101...
John Darwak
325e/i (many mods)