Alfa Romeo/Alfa Romeo Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
merging lanes early
- To: <alfa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: merging lanes early
- From: "Dan Hagrman" <dan@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:40:50 -0500
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Reply-to: "Dan Hagrman" <dan@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-alfa@xxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcNFhscZCMdoGlnzRuad45J38/ITAQACFaNx
- Thread-topic: alfa-digest V9 #628
I don't think "good at merging early" is an ideal trait. I would think using all lanes up to the obstruction is a much more efficient strategy for traffic as a whole than merging early, assuming folks don't wedge themselves in trying to cut each other off at the "mouth". More lanes spread the stop & go delay times around as car after car accelerates and decelerates. Of course I merge early because I'm much more likely to be let in if I get in line quick, and I wonder if that's the reasoning for almost no one using the closed lane.
---SNIP---
My impression that Americans are good at merging early when lanes merge doesn't resonate with Joe's observations. Well, let me just add that I saw a sign in PA on US 30 east of York (2 lanes in each direction). They actually encouraged people to use both lanes and merge just before the obstruction. I am still somewhat puzzled by this sign.
Sonny
'91 164 S
Baltimore
---END SNIP---
[demime 0.99c.7 removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat]
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to majordomo@domain.elided
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index