Re: Speedvision coverage is pathetic

To: <alfa@domain.elided>
Subject: Re: Speedvision coverage is pathetic
From: "Paul Misencik" <paul@domain.elided>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:54:28 -0500
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Organization: P. Roman Media
References: <NJEBIBACEPCOJCBEJDILKEEEDAAA.john_katos@domain.elided>
Reply-to: "Paul Misencik" <paul@domain.elided>
Sender: owner-alfa@domain.elided

> Oh please Mr. Smith, not more flame bait.

Yes, and after three full years of living in major metropolitan areas but
somehow never having the right cable company to get Speed, I am not going to
bitch TOO much about the channel that is finally allowing me to watch
Formula One again!

(Even though it IS the NASCAR channel...)

Paul Misencik
Huntersville, NC  28078
email: paul@domain.elided
www.paoloroman.com
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to majordomo@domain.elided

References:
- RE: Speedvision coverage is pathetic
  - From: "John Katos" <john_katos@domain.elided>

Prev by Date: Matta AR Jeep
Next by Date: 93 Spider engine mounts
Previous by thread: RE: Speedvision coverage is pathetic
Next by thread: Motronic pistons in older 2L engines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index