Re: {SPAM?} RE: 2.0 V6

To: Glenn Wasserman <glennwa@domain.elided>, George Graves <gmgraves@domain.elided>, <alfa@domain.elided>
Subject: Re: {SPAM?} RE: 2.0 V6
From: Keith Strini <keith.strini@domain.elided>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 16:11:24 -0400
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
In-reply-to: <BCDB2C3F59F5744EBE37C715D66E779C031D36F7@domain.elided>
Reply-to: Keith Strini <keith.strini@domain.elided>
Sender: owner-alfa@domain.elided
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331

If I'm not mistaken (which I probably am) the Turbo on this engine doesn't
actually sit up any higher it takes up more side room which isn't where the
clearance problem on the spider is. It would fit the same as a 3.0
conversion but require more side space. But I could be mistaken.

Keith


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Eagles Nest, and is
believed to be clean.
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to majordomo@domain.elided

References:
- RE: 2.0 V6
  - From: "Glenn Wasserman" <glennwa@domain.elided>

Prev by Date: RE: 2.0 V6
Next by Date: Re: 2.0 V6
Previous by thread: RE: 2.0 V6
Next by thread: 164 air con to 134a....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index