RE: tensioners again

Subject: RE: tensioners again
From: Richard Welty <rwelty@domain.elided>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 14:15:55 -0400

At 01:39 PM 7/7/99 -0400, Sedon, Doug (OD/ORS) wrote:
>if i have it all wrong, then why is the zat "abortion" a, well er uh, an
>abortion?  if the belts don't change size (ie - stretch), then why do they
>*need* a tensioner that adjusts for temperature?  why do they need more
>tension when cold?  i'm missing something here...

the _engine_ changes size.

cheers,
   richard

------------------------------

Prev by Date: Re: brake fluid boiling??GTV-6
Next by Date: re.:cats exhaust and fun
Previous by thread: tensioners again
Next by thread: RE: tensioners again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index