IHC/IHC Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ihc] RE: That would be Grammer's radiator mounts...
- To: <ihc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ihc] RE: That would be Grammer's radiator mounts...
- From: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:24:17 -0700
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
- In-reply-to: <E1BsS44-0004pY-QX@domain.elided>
- Reply-to: "Jim Grammer" <jgrammer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx
>Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:03:14 -0700
>From: Joel M Brodsky <jmbrodsky@domain.elided>
>Subject: [ihc] Grammer's fan mounts
>Jim,
>Just as an aside, with those McMaster rubber insulators (for your fan),
>aren't those designed for
>mounting machines, like fans, pumps and blowers? Usually it's the weight
>of the machine bearing
>on the mounting. In your instance, you're using the tension of the
>vulcanizing to hold the radiator, and
>in shear too, no-less.
>Is that a recommended mounting technique? Eventually, won't those fail in
>tension and in shear and leave your
>radiator flailing dangerously in the hazard area?
Joel, good buddy, the catalog page that shows 9376K129( www.mcmaster.com )
has some interesting information about 'vibration damping mounts', including
the shear rating for mounts that are shear rated ;)
These particular mounts are good to 18# each in shear x 4 is 72#. A SII
radiator weighs what, 15#? Last time I filled a 3 core, it seems to have
taken about 1.5gal for the radiator alone, call it 2 x 8.33#/gal is 16.66# +
15#= 31.66#. 2.27 safety factor. Maybe not optimal, but Doug's been running
his for quite a while now with no problema. Guess it wouldn't hurt to take a
peek at them once in awhile, kinda like checking the oil? :)
Jim
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index