IHC/IHC Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ihc] Ignition - 'nother tid-bit
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Mandera" <tsm1@domain.elided>
To: <ihc@domain.elided>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 18:15
Subject: [ihc] Ignition - 'nother tid-bit
> Forgot to mention.. the tired 345 I removed from this truck would ping
> on 85octane with ~8deg BTDC. Same disty, same wires, same brand plugs,
> pulling a bit less weight.
>
> Might've been carbon buildup on the piston or head creating a hot spot..
> or might've been the "quench factor"..
>
Tom, I've gotta say that this quench thing seems fairly odd to me.
Theoretically, wouldn't the distance of quench need to vary at *least* with
the size of the piston (bore) to keep proportions the same?
A set distance seems way too simple to me for something like that...
-Ryan
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.718 / Virus Database: 474 - Release Date: 7/9/04
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index