RE: [ihc] headers

["Steve Stegmann" <steve.stegmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

To me it was worth it just to get rid of the donut gaskets and the
attendanat alingment problems.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ihc@domain.elided [mailto:owner-ihc@domain.elided]On Behalf Of
Jeff Randolph @ Bigscout79
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 12:22 PM
To: John Hofstetter; Rocky Lear
Cc: ihc-digest@domain.elided
Subject: Re: [ihc] headers


Either on here or on the bb, I remember reading - and it being the general
consensus - that headers for sv's were really not a good bang for the buck
choice.  I of course don't remember the reasoning behind this, but I stored
it as a note to self.

-Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hofstetter" <hofs@domain.elided>
To: "Rocky Lear" <rockylear@domain.elided>
Cc: <ihc-digest@domain.elided>
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [ihc] headers


> On May 14, 2004, at 8:33 PM, Rocky Lear wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking about putting headers on my latest project. Which are
> > best and how well do they actually fit in real life applications?
> >
> > Rocky
> >
> >
> Stan's headers are the only real choice as far as I know. They are very
> well made. Makes starter access more difficult, but otherwise, it's all
> good.
>
> John Hofstetter
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.683 / Virus Database: 445 - Release Date: 5/12/2004