Re: [ihc] Jim Aos ?

["Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim or Ginger Aos" <jaos@domain.elided>
To: <ihc@domain.elided>
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 23:54
Subject: Re: [ihc] Jim Aos ?


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@domain.elided>
> To: <jma@domain.elided>; "Jim or Ginger Aos" <jaos@domain.elided>; "John
> Hofstetter" <hofs@domain.elided>; <ihc@domain.elided>
> Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 5:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [ihc] Jim Aos ?
>
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "John M. Adams" <jma@domain.elided>
> > To: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@domain.elided>; "Jim or Ginger Aos"
> > <jaos@domain.elided>; "John Hofstetter" <hofs@domain.elided>;
> > <ihc@domain.elided>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 19:45
> > Subject: RE: [ihc] Jim Aos ?
> >
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-ihc@domain.elided [mailto:owner-ihc@domain.elided]On Behalf Of
> > > > Ryan Moore
> > > > Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 6:12 PM
> > > > To: Jim or Ginger Aos; John Hofstetter; ihc@domain.elided
> > > > Subject: Re: [ihc] Jim Aos ?
> > > >
> > > > I noted two things.   First of all, our esteemed Mr. Hoffstetter
> > > > said "this
> > > > might be Jim Aos in an earlier segment of his life" and second,
there
> > are
> > > > only two females and a number of canines present in the picture.
> > > >
> > > > -Ryan
> > >
> > > I noticed that too, Ryan. I didn't want to say anything, though,
either
> > out
> > > of respect for Mr. A. or Mr. H. - I couldn't tell which! -John A.
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > It kind of surprised me too.  However, the lack of the ' *and* the "his"
> > indicate intention in the initial post so me...
> >
> > The question is, which party in the picture is being referred to?
>
> Ryan, John  A., and all.  John and I have had some good visits, and my
first
> IH was like the pic except for the permanent camper and the things I
> mentioned.  Also, John H. and I like a little humor with double meaning
> potential. My wife and I have been happily married for a little over 15
> years.  We both came from previously failed marriages.   She only one.  I
> failed three times.
>
> John in no way is being nasty.  Actually, I consider him one of the
closest
> on this list.  Jim Aos

I didn't think he was being nasty, just taking a rather unexpected jab...

But wouldn't this be more of a case of incorrect grammatical usage as
opposed to double meaning? ;)

-Ryan


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.618 / Virus Database: 397 - Release Date: 3/9/04