Re: Tom's 'new' motor

To: jmbrodsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Joel M Brodsky)
Subject: Re: Tom's 'new' motor
From: danees@xxxxxxxxx (Daniel Nees)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:33:03 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: ihc@xxxxxxxxxx
Content-disposition: Inline
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
In-reply-to: "Joel M Brodsky" <jmbrodsky@domain.elided>'s message of Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:44:46 -0700
Reply-to: danees@xxxxxxxxx (Daniel Nees)
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

And you guys tell me to stay away from 392's....
   I guess Tom needs to stay away from 392's and 345's, oh, also 304's
since his racer motor is a 304 Maybe Tom should stick to the 4 cylinder
he used to have. He never did blow up one of them.

Dan Nees
danees@domain.elided

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tom's 'new' motor
  - From: Tom Mandera

Prev by Date: Re: Tom's 392
Next by Date: Re: rubber vs urethane bushings
Previous by thread: Re: Tom's 'new' motor
Next by thread: Re: Tom's 'new' motor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index