Asbestos Underware

["John Hofstetter" <hofs@domain.elided>]

Eric,
I suspect that most of us on this digest believe that the 1st
Amendment is inexorably and ultimately tied to the 2nd Amendment, and
somewhere down the line, our right to own ridiculously inefficient
(gas mileage wise) old IHC's is also tied into our willingness to
stand for individual freedom. Anyone who doesn't perceive that our
individual freedoms are being not only eroded but bulldozed, just
hasn't been paying attention. Those who perceive this, but don't care,
don't deserve the freedoms that are our birthright thanks to those who
have been willing to stand up for them in the past. 
Sorry, no flame. 
John H.
----------
From: owner-ihc-digest@domain.elided (ihc-digest)
To: ihc-digest@domain.elided
Subject: ihc-digest V6 #839
Date: Fri, May 14, 1999, 8:54 PM


I think it would be a bad thing for pro-gun
activists to deny someone's right to express their opinion. We have
the
Rosies and the Rushes. Somewhere in between has to lie some sanity.

Majority rule is great unless you ask 4 wolves and a sheep what they
should have for dinner.

Peace,
Eric (doning my asbestos underware) Hegstrom