Re: 345 to 392

To: Owen <renarac@domain.elided>
Subject: Re: 345 to 392
From: "McDowell's" <gmcd@domain.elided>
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 01:44:23 -0500
CC: IHCdigest <ihc-digest@domain.elided>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <372CA57F.DEBF19D6@domain.elided> <007201be9521$5f363500$b986bfce@renarac>
Reply-To: "McDowell's" <gmcd@domain.elided>
Sender: owner-ihc@domain.elided

Shucks, I guess if it were that simple, everybody would be doing it already.
 Thanks Owen
    Grant

Owen wrote:

> No.
>
> The 345 and 392 are supposed to have different castings. You might try to
> overbore it, but my guess would be super thin cylinder walls and all of the
> overheating/piston wear problems associated with it.
> All of the C.I. gain from 345 to 392 is in bore. So there isn't a "stroker"
> 345 option either.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> F

References:
- 345 to 392
  - From: "McDowell's" <gmcd@domain.elided>
- Re: 345 to 392
  - From: "Owen" <renarac@domain.elided>

Prev by Date: Re: Quiet weekend!!
Next by Date: after market mfgrs
Prev by thread: Re: 345 to 392
Next by thread: Petersons 4wheel and Off Road
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index