IHC/IHC Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Towing: WB vs. Weight
I concede that one, mass is #1. In fact, after I posted I wondered how I left
that out. A while back Joel made the guess that weight was why the T'all
seemed to have a reputation for being a better tow vehicle than the very
similiar but slightly longer wb Suburban.
Of course, as everybody can tell, I hate to post without actual knowledge
of the facts <g>, so, um, Howard, I think it would be a good idea if you would pull
some strings and get me a loaner 9670 for next year so I can compare
them head to head... purely for scientific purposes, of course!! You know,
somebody's got to do it. (don't forget the CD player- A/C is standard, isn't it??
- are they available with sleeper cabs?).
It probably would have lower fuel costs!
**In Use**
'70 1200D 4x4 Travelette 392 4spd
'73 1210 Wagonmaster, 392 auto
**Prepping for Repaint**
'67 1000B step-side p/up BG241 + 4spd
**Parts (future projects?)**
'72 1010 T'all 392 at, '67 1000B T'all 266 3sp, '68 1100C 4X4 T'all 345 at
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index