[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Synthetic ATF vs Mineral ATF
- Subject: Re: Synthetic ATF vs Mineral ATF
- From: "Jeff Lloyd" <jslz3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 15:21:07 GMT
Brandon,
Very simple answer, The Synthetics are too sliperly. at least with the
manuals, The Sincromeshs need a little resistance to work properly too much
slip and you have (what feels like) no syncros (ask me how I know) I guess
the auto's need a little resistance to operate properly.. they have
lubricated clutch type devices also I think... Yes Synthetic does provide
superior lubricating properties (if that is what you want)
YMMV
Jeff Lloyd
>
> A friend of mine enquired with the BMW dealership if he should use
>synthetic ATF for his E36 325i with the ZF 5-speed autobox. The BMW
>service
>department said that synthetic ATF should NOT be used in the BMW
>slushboxes.
>No reason was given but he only recommended using the regular mineral ATF,
>as per BMW service instructions. Now that puzzles me coz I always thought
>Synthetic Lubricants are superior to the mineral oil and they exceed the
>specs of regular mineral oil. I must admit that my auto tranny, now with
>the Mobil Synthetic ATF does not shift as smoothly as before, when it was
>filled with Motul Mineral ATF. Does anyone out there have any idea,
>comments, recommendations? Hope you all can shed some light. Thanks a
>lot!
>
>Regards,
>Brandon Ong
>Singapore
>95' 320i Cabrio - 5 Speed Auto
>
>
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
------------------------------