[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subject: Re: HD or sport?
- Subject: Re: Subject: Re: HD or sport?
- From: ChrisBourk@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 00:17:57 EST
In a message dated 98-12-01 14:07:51 EST, you write: -Mike
klein@domain.elided >>
<<"Stiffness" of a shock has nothing to do with height of the car. There is
no
spring rate associated with a shock, even a high pressure gas shock.
Stiffness
of a shock describes the damping factor, which has no effect on the height of
the car or the shock's compress. A stiff shock compresses exactly as much as
a
soft shock with the same weight on it; it just takes more energy to get
there.>>
Mike, This isn't exactly true. Even though there aren't spring rates
advertised for gas shocks they do indeed act in the similitude of springs.
Also, a car that is lower will *usually* take less less energy (as a
percentage) on the frame and more on the springs because of the geometry of
the suspension - the control arms are more lateral. Your last statement is
somewhat contradictory - if it takes more energy then it DOES NOT compress as
much (with the same amount of energy). Of coarse it will settle to the same
height when standing still though.
<< However, as m6bigdog@domain.elided ably explained, high-pressure gas shocks (of
which Bilsteins are one example) will add an offset to your height. They
push
their two halves apart with a certain constant force from the gas pressure,>>
The pressure increases with the shocks compression - the same as springs do.
< which raises the car a static amount until compensated by the suspension's
springs. This force doesn't affect spring rate because it is a constant
force,
irrespective of position. A spring's force is proportional to position.>
Wrong, - it compliments the springs rate - it's additive.
Christopher
------------------------------