[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
misunderstanding response back to jim and Thi V.
- Subject: misunderstanding response back to jim and Thi V.
- From: mark kibort <mkibort@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 19:06:19 -0500
Message text written by INTERNET:bmw@domain.elided
Mark said:
> > what is your deal, did you get lousy SAT scores
and later said:
> > My deal is not such a big one, just looking a common problem in a
new way.
Another Basic Rule of Lawyering:
"Don't ask questions for which you don't know the answer." =
File that under 'not knowing your opponent'.
- thi v.
<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
if you understood the question, it wasnt to say that he got lousy SAT
scores, it was just the opposite, It was, " why are you acting like a
person that is intelectually challenged". (It was obvious that he was a
smart , but classless guy, with abominable socal skills)
I did know this, but you and he did not get the facetious question. =
Let me translate.
Jim, you are a smart guy , why dont you act like one??
understand now?
mark
------------------------------