[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Option 3 on MAF - AFM Conversion.
- Subject: Option 3 on MAF - AFM Conversion.
- From: "Neil Deshpande" <Ndeshp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 14:19:27 -0500
Ed:
As far as I know there is a difference in dynamics between the MAF and the =
AFM since one is a mechanical system and one is solid state. There are =
overshoots, etc., that cannot simply be mapped since it is not a static =
quantity, i.e., the relations between the two outputs change depending on =
the dynamic actions too. I imagine you could add another dimension to the =
map and do it. Did you?
Since your setup is obviously working well, I would like to know where I =
am wrong in my understanding or, if I am correct, how you got over this =
problem.
Thanks.
Neil Deshpande
1988 325 is
1989 325 iC
------------------------------