[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: M Roadster vs Boxster
- Subject: re: M Roadster vs Boxster
- From: "Michael Wendell" <mwendell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 23:41:16 -0400
i would think that the M Roadster should be compared to the
forthcoming Boxster S and not the base-model Boxster, yes? a more
viable comparison for the base model Boxster would be the Z3 2.8
(although when the Boxster debuted it was unfortunately compared to
the Z3 1.9 by many car mags- and as would be expected, the Z3 was
found lacking)
so, how does the base Boxster compare to the 2.8?
M Roadster Boxster Z3 2.8 Boxster S
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
0-60 5.2 6.1 6.5 ?
1/4mi 14.2 14.7 14.9 ?
HP 240 201 189 ?
WT/HP 12.8 13.7 15.0 ?
Torque 236 181 203 ?
WT/Torq 13.1 15.2 14.0 ?
Slalom (mph) 65.3 65.0 61.4 ?
60-0 (ft) 116 120 123 ?
80-0 (ft) 203 210 215 ?
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Base $42,200 $39,900 $35,900 $?
As Tested: $43,174 $45,775 $38,317 $?
anyone have figures for the Boxster S ?
m.
ps: i'm NOT a porsche fan, so don't even go there.
------------------------------