RE: Slick 50

• Subject: RE: Slick 50
• From: Pat Vellender <74312.665@domain.elided>
• Date: 09 Aug 96 02:06:05 EDT

Well, I know that no one believes in the validity of Slick 50, but here's my
experience.  Once upon a time, I had an '84 318i (E30).  In the winter if the
car were cold, I would have to start the car 3 times in order for it to remain
running.  After I put Slick 50 in it, the car always stayed running after the
first cold start.

Now, I've seen arguments about long term effects, but I didn't notice any.
That's not to say they didn't exist, I just didn't notice them.  The cam was
starting to go when I sold the car, but I only had Slick 50 in it for 20k before
the sale.

So the questions are - 1.  Did Slick 50 cause this cam damage?; 2.  Could the
damage have been caused in 20k?

Pat V.
'89 535i (E34)

• Prev: Re: <E36> Cleaning side moldings
• Next: '89 325i - Headlight replacement?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread