alfacybersite wrote:
I was joking with respect to the image I linked to, but I'd still like to see larger versions of the images you have.Mark Denovich I suspect is having a bit of fun, but have had this question (however, more subtly put) before: "Speaking of going blind... How about linking the thumbnails on your site to the original larger images? The itty-bitty images don't do justice to the work or the subject."
Actually it wouldn't change the download time at all for the page. You would still be downloading all small thumbnails. The difference is that they would be linked to the larger versions. Thus if someone wanted to see a particular picture at a higher resolution they could, one at a time.There are approximately 200 images alone on the series of 1960 Giulietta Spider Veloce pages. If I'd included 'click on image to enlarge' for all 200, it would have at the very least quadrupled the megabytes, not to mention download time - unless someone knows something I don't.
Nope. It's a Dell D800 laptop, which has a wide aspect (WUXGA) LCD. It is stunningly sharp, and all that screen real estate makes for an excellent mobile coding platform. We've got dual head workstations at work (2 19" monitors at 1600x1200) but I like my laptop better. The LCD is just nicer to my eyes. (I'm very sensitive to CRT flicker.)Did you get one of the highly advertised new enlargement patches for your monitor so it could go up to 1900 x 1200?