Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:09:29 -0400
From: "Jim Steck" <4sfed@domain.elided>
Subject: [alfa] Re: Quadra flow and horsepower
I don't doubt John Norman's dyno study . . . but it doesn't represent
the real operating conditions. To compensate for day-to-day
weather conditions, dyno results are generally corrected to reflect
expected results at standard temperature and pressure. That's
70 degrees F and 29.92 in Hg . . . so the Quadra flo is better at
high RPM when inlet temperatures are the same.
In the car, the Spica airbox is easily 50 degrees cooler than the
Quadra flo . . . a cold air box in Colaizzi's Giulietta vintage racer
dropped the inlet air temperature by 70 degrees. Fifty degrees will
make a _5%_ difference in Hp. If we accept Stevan's premise that
the Quadra flo only helps with high output (airflow) engines, we
have to conclude that on a stock engine, the Spica airbox is
5% better because of the difference in temperature. The truth
probably lies somewhere in between with the Spica still ahead.
- -- -- --
Jim Steck, AutoComponenti
8906 Darke County Line
Brookville, OH 45309
ph: (937) 884-5142
fax: (937) 884-5144
email: jim@domain.elided
web: www.autocomponenti.com