FW: Re: Ohm's Law

[David Partridge <David_Partridge@xxxxxxx>]

At least I hope he was talking about grungy linkage from the motor to the
wipers themselves.
If not,......nevermind!
B^P
-----Original Message-----
From: David Partridge 
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 1:06 PM
To: 'mred2u@domain.elided'; 'alfa digest'
Subject: Re: Ohm's Law


Ed,
In defense of Mr. Shorey, I beleive he was referring to "Mechanical
Resistance"
which will indeed lead to higher current draw. 
(needs more "P" which is of course IxV)
Consider yourselves enlightened.
:-)
****************************************************************************
>Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:41:52 -0400
>From: "Ed & Marsha Prytherch" mred2u@domain.elided
>Subject: Ohm's Law
>Brian Shorey wrote "Additional resistance can result in a higher current
>draw through the circuit."
>Brian: Please enlighten us. Mr Ohm said that I = E/R. Has something changed
>in the 30 years since I studied electrical engineering?
>In my humble opinion, the blown fuse could be due to a short in the wiring
>or the motor windings, or incorrect connection of wires to the switch or
the
>motor. There is a good description of wiper operation at
>http://web.raex.com/~volks/schem/wiper.gif
>Ed Prytherch, Columbia, SC
****************************************************************************
****
Dave Partridge
76 Spider
"Free advice is worth what you make of it."
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to majordomo@domain.elided