[alfa] Re: Zat Tensioner Vs Hydraulic in non-hydraulic mode Vs...

To: alfa@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [alfa] Re: Zat Tensioner Vs Hydraulic in non-hydraulic mode Vs...
From: George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:38:05 -0700
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
In-reply-to: <E1C97Wv-000292-9k@domain.elided>
References: <E1C97Wv-000292-9k@domain.elided>
Reply-to: George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-alfa@xxxxxxxxxx

On Sep 19, 2004, at 12:39 PM, alfa-digest wrote:

Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:30:07 -0700
From: alfacybersite <acs@domain.elided>
Subject: [alfa] Zat Tensioner Vs Hydraulic in non-hydraulic mode Vs...


Next Sunday's sermon will be titled "Front Wheel Drive. Why?".

Because it makes it easier (read that cheaper) to assemble the car.
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to majordomo@domain.elided

Prev by Date: [alfa] Alfa Digest Clubs: regular posting
Next by Date: [alfa] I finally did it, my Spider is listed.
Previous by thread: [alfa] Re: chains vs belts for cams
Next by thread: [alfa] Re: Zat Tensioner Vs Hydraulic in non-hydraulic mode Vs...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index