Re: [ihc] Mathematical ponderings, used to be Max sustained

To: "John M. Adams" <jma@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Welty <rwelty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ihc] Mathematical ponderings, used to be Max sustained
From: John Hofstetter <hofs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:48:12 -0700
Cc: "ihc digest" <ihc@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dan Nees" <cookiedan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
In-reply-to: <LPBBIBAEGJDCKGEHINLMCEEPHJAA.jma@domain.elided>
References: <LPBBIBAEGJDCKGEHINLMCEEPHJAA.jma@domain.elided>
Reply-to: John Hofstetter <hofs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

On Sep 12, 2004, at 7:58 PM, John M. Adams wrote:

I bet you're thinking of "Occam's Razor", or the "principle of parsimony".
Yes?
John A.

Thank you, gentlemen!

John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ihc] Mathematical ponderings, used to be Max sustained
  - From: Ryan Moore

References:
- RE: [ihc] Mathematical ponderings, used to be Max sustained winds to drive in?
  - From: John M. Adams

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index