IHC/IHC Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ihc] RE: Pete's mods
Nope, no clarification needed unless "flipping foreword and laying flat"
is unclear. Foreword, horizontal with the
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Moore [mailto:baradium@domain.elided]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 2:40 PM
To: Ed Sohm; 'Peter Shubin'; ihc@domain.elided
Cc: jgrammer@domain.elided
Subject: Re: [ihc] RE: Pete's mods
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Sohm" <idaemes@domain.elided>
To: "'Peter Shubin'" <pshubin@domain.elided>; <ihc@domain.elided>
Cc: <jgrammer@domain.elided>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 15:15
Subject: RE: [ihc] RE: Pete's mods
> I wasn't paying too close of attention so forgive me if this has been
> covered. Triangle springs have been known to settle a little, like
> starting out closer to 5" and sagging to 4". Some people have had a
> problem with stock length shackles on the front flipping foreword and
> laying flat. My brother-in-law's Traveler did this and I made
slightly
> longer shackles on Joel B's advice and they stopped doing it.
Something
> to consider. I sure wouldn't go any shorter with the shackles.
I thought Triangle springs were the only springs that *didn't* have the
shackle flip problem. You mean flipping backwards don't you? Never
heard
of any flipping forwards.
Need some clarification.
-Ryan
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 3/30/04
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index