Re: Emissions Testing A possible answer

To: Eric Hegstrom <ehegstrom@domain.elided>
Subject: Re: Emissions Testing A possible answer
From: Steve Stegmann <stegmann@domain.elided>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 08:10:39 -0500 (CDT)
cc: tjhemh@domain.elided, ihc mailing list <ihc-digest@domain.elided>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <371271F4.FF10DA4F@domain.elided>
Reply-To: Steve Stegmann <stegmann@domain.elided>
Sender: owner-ihc@domain.elided

Eric,

Grams per mile really makes more sense if you're trying to control the
total amount of pollutants.  They do ppm and % here in MO too.  They
pretty much have to unless they use a chassis dyno.  

Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven A. Stegmann
     _/_/_/    _/      _/_/_/ "No free man shall ever be debarred the use
   _/    _/   _/_/   _/    _/  of arms.  The strongest reason for the 
   _/        _/ _/   _/        people to retain the right to keep and bear
    _/_/    _/  _/    _/_/     arms is, as a last resort, to protect 
       _/  _/_/_//       _/    themselves against tyranny in government"
 _/    _/ _/    _/ _/    _/    
 _/_/_/  _/     _/ _/_/_/         Thomas Jefferson, June 1776
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
- Re: Emissions Testing A possible answer
  - From: Eric Hegstrom <ehegstrom@domain.elided>

Prev by Date: Re: Emissions Testing A possible answer
Next by Date: Re: cut-out fender flares, etc.
Prev by thread: Re: Emissions Testing A possible answer
Next by thread: Re: Emissions Testing A possible answer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index