lo mile 4.0 L vs. relatively hi mile 4.4 L

["John F. Thomas" <johnt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Would someone care to offer advice on whether a purchase of a '95 740 w/ the
4.0L and 30-40 k miles would be advisable when compared to a '96 w/ the 4.4L
and say 60-70 k miles?  Purchase prices are close...  Obvious concern is
related to the sulphur problems on the older M60 engines and whether that
will adversely affect the engines longevity.  Any advice?  My own
inclination is to go with the '95 unless there are other reasons that the
'95s are less desireable.  Either digest or direct email would be fine.
TIA.
John Thomas
'94 318i   55k
'87 325  165k...dinan chip, suspension...still orig clutch, muffler...eng,
trans...
http://www.wenet.net/users/johnt/bmw.html

------------------------------