[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Who unplugged the hair dryer???
- Subject: Re: Who unplugged the hair dryer???
- From: ChrisBourk@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 02:01:38 EST
In a message dated 98-11-30 06:44:54 EST, you write:
<as they are fine machine , but suffer from
the choking that the manufactures have been trying to solve for decades. =
=
AIR FLOW! =>
Yes mark this has been a CONSTANT problem with my M635 - airflow. I just
attribute it to the lousy design of the cylinder heads.
<No one has posted in support of the Eram, because noone has tried or dyno=
ed
it. >>
Now that speaks volumes....
<The E-RAM is only 400 watts, 30 amps of fairly efficient electrical power
creating a lot more air mass flow than=
a
shop vac, or a hair dryer. a 1.5 hp shop vac only puts out 200 cfm at=
3
psi, where E-RAM creates a little pressure but matches the engine flow
requirements. (ie, 250 -500 cfm) at a slight pressure.>>
I guess you're right and Bosch is wrong when they say their alternators are
about 50% efficienct.
< Do you or have you thought about how the E-RAM works ?>
Mark, the eram does not work. What part of that statement don't you
understand?
------------------------------