[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Air Flow Meter Conversions. Chips Vs. Split Second. Why Split
- Subject: Air Flow Meter Conversions. Chips Vs. Split Second. Why Split
- From: "Neil Deshpande" <Ndeshp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 09:34:40 -0500
Second is cheaper than a chip.
Rob:
I had put out a similar mail some time ago and was replied to by Jim =
Conforti himself.
Reprogramming the ECU is most certainly the most elegant way to go. It
=
has been done for the E36 (M3 only, maybe) and you can see Duane
Collie's =
comments on the system's performance on Turner Motorsports' WWW page.
Reprogramming the ECU takes tons of dyno time. There are apparently no
=
equations that can give you the engine curves, etc., and one has to =
determine them by experiment. Of course, a custom chip can be written
for =
any engine mod (this one included), but it would not be cost effective
to =
do it for the E30 since enough E30 owners would not be interested. I =
guess the $850 that Split Second charges is lower than what Jim C., for
=
example, would charge to develop a custom chip.
The Split Second system is expensive due to the fact that it is more =
versatile and the chip would be cheap because it would be hard-wired to
=
one applicaion, PROVIDED you sold enough of them. If you did not sell =
enough, it is better to sell enough of an adaptable system such as the =
Split Second so you can get the numbers that way.
This mail is based on my understanding of Jim C's mail to me and the =
Digest.
If you do carry out the Split Second conversion, I would be interested
in =
the results. I know that Russ Poffenberger in Sunnyvale, CA, intended
to =
do this and has not had the time to complete it. I could contact him
and =
perhaps he would be able to help out.
Neil Deshpande
88 325 is
89 325 iC
- ------------------------------
------------------------------