Re: Tensioner vs. Detensioner

[Mark Denovich <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jerry in Houston wrote:

> I keep seeing this device referred to as a
> "tensioner", as if its vasic job is to provide tension
> to the cam belt.  It is just the opposite,
For the record, I'm well aware of that fact.   But it does obviously 
supply static tension.  That's why when it fails you're screwed.   So 
when people refer to it as a tensioner, I don't get upset about it.

The real problem is the number of timing belt teeth that engage the 
rear/right cam pulley.   If the belt wrapped around the pulley more, as 
seen in other cars with timing belts, I think the whole setup would be 
more reliable.  I've often thought that an idler pulley between the cams 
would work.

	--Mark
	The Alfa Wiki: http://alfa.denovich.org
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to majordomo@domain.elided