Re: Webers or Spica?

To: alfa@domain.elided
Subject: Re: Webers or Spica?
From: Zamani Zambri <zzambrimail@domain.elided>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:04:44 -0800 (PST)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-reply-to: <E18ErDg-0003WN-00@domain.elided>
Reply-to: Zamani Zambri <zzambrimail@domain.elided>
Sender: owner-alfa@domain.elided

>The atomization from virtually ANY injection system (unless air 
>shrouded injectors or compressed air boosted injectors are used) does
>not even APPROACH the level of atomization of the fuel which is
>achieved by Webers.

Hi Greg,

Why do you say so? Do our modern day efi systems with high pressure
fuel(s) rail still not atomize better than carbs? Don't carbs rely on
engine vacuum as opposed to high pressure fuel spray of a modern efi? I
still cannot see why carbs atomize better. Unless of course you are
comparing to the SPICA setup.

Zamani
Yahoo! Mail Plus  Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to majordomo@domain.elided

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Webers or Spica?
  - From: "John Katos" <john_katos@domain.elided>

Prev by Date: Contact patch....
Next by Date: Re: Contact patch....
Previous by thread: Re: Webers or Spica?
Next by thread: RE: Webers or Spica?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index