Alfa Romeo/Alfa Romeo Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Giulia coupes, GTAs, GTVs & The Best Bits
- Subject: Re: Giulia coupes, GTAs, GTVs & The Best Bits
- From: "Joe Garcia" <corsanostra@domain.elided>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 22:08:27 EST
Hm. I seem to have opened one of Pandora's better boxes with this thread.
Scott Fisher stated:
<<Short answer: Don Baker's car. If you were there at the ARA tech
session last Saturday, you know what I mean... if not, keep reading.>>
Seeing as how 99.99% of ARA activity is exactly one continent's width
away...
<<Long answer: It depends on what you consider best, what you want to use
the car for, and what you're willing to do or have done. I'm working on
exactly such a car, answering exclusively to myself about what I want.>>
The (probably) vague response to the long answer: I'd like--who
wouldn't?--the fastest car possible while keeping every shred of docility
intact. That means no GTAms nor replicas thereof. Also, for some weird
reason, I am rather averse to having stuff machined to fit. Mind you, that
doesn't mean I won't do it...just means that I'll feel weird. But those are
a series of issues I need to work out on my own.
As far as interiors go, I am absolutely, resolutely, Helvetic in my
neutrality to any one year over the other.
On more road worthy matters, I marginally prefer the 4.11 to the 4.56, since
the bulk of my driving (business or pleasure) does not involve quite that
degree of acceleration. If it did, of course, then 4.56 would be the ratio
of choice.
Les Singh points out a sad bit when he says the GTA head won't sit quietly
atop the 2000. (Although, in thumbing through Pat Braden's AROB, I got the
distinct impression he implied the GTA head would work with the 2000. Then
again, I may have horribly misread that. Comments form the peanut gallery?)
I am fortunate to have very strong contacts in Argentina, and when I attend
the PRI show in Indy I'll ask Ballestrini about "GTAing" a 2000.
<<Induction: my personal opinion of the Spica is very high right now. I love
its responsiveness, its absolute absence of flat spots, its
>relatively easy cold-starting, and its out and out performance. Yeah, the
>Webers on my '67 GT Junior are cool -- in fact, at one point I said that I
>specifically bought that car because it *didn't* have Spica on it. I
>recant, and the hot-rod motor I'm planning for it will have Spica (with a
>stop at Wes Ingram's to get the fuel cam set for the other internal mods I
>make to the engine). All Alfa race cars since March 1968 used Spica, so it
>even has historical provenance.>>
My views have similarly done a 180 deg. about-face. In my raw youth when I
was doing all manner of experimentation upon my '76 Alfetta GT, the change
from the SPICA unit (which I now realize was just a shot-to-Hell SPICA
unit...mea culpa) to 40DCOEs was akin to having, after 18 months finally
uloaded the crate of anvils the car had in the back seat. My views changed
after speaking with Dave Kane (of RML Racing) who has done some mighty neat
things with the aforesaid SPICA.
<<Brakes: I don't plan to put power brakes in my '67. I like the pedal feel
of the unassisted brakes, but then my family tends to have thighs like
mature oaks so I don't generally need any sissy power-assist, at least not
on cars like the Alfa which have superb brakes in the first place.>>
For reasons which shan't be adequately explored here, I have come to view
power-anything as the ultimate in sissiness, possibly even wussiness. I have
however, recanted on the matter of air conditioning. While in my raw youth
it seemed acceptable to sit in traffic during South Fla.'s periodic 90 deg
F. + 90% humidity days, now I am not so keen on the concept.
Yes, I know. It limits my pool of potential vehicles.
<<Wheels: mostly subjective. I like the look of the turbina wheels on a
GT>>
For some reason, some of the newer Zagato aftermarket wheels methinks) look
mighty dandy on this shape. I agree with you that the Bertone shape is among
the very best that has ever been made to glide along pavement. While there
are others I'd rank with this shape, for the life o' me, I can't think of
any now. Oh, wait. NART Spyder.
<<In short... you can't really go wrong with any of these cars, especially
if you're willing to mix and match (and if your state's smog laws permit it,
of course).>>
I'm lucky as in FL (unless someone changed something and didn't inform *me*)
only 1975 & later cars have to undergo any scrutiny at all. Which means that
whomever currently owns that 1976 Alfetta has had SEVERE headaches getting
the car to pass inspection. Tee hee. (Caveat emptor, I guess.)
- -Joe in SoFla, between Alfae
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index